Does England need its own New gTLD .England?

BBC had an article yesterday debating the need of a New gTLD for England: .England.

Scotland will have its New gTLD .scot this summer and the city of London will have it’s own in a few months: .london.

But the .England New gTLD is not anywhere near that. There was no application for .england in the first round of applications for New gTLDs at the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

Richard Stevenson, from domain name registrar 1&1 Internet, which is one of a number of firms selling .london addresses, believes it could take a number of years before efforts for an England TLD to reach fruition.

“As no formal application was submitted to ICANN for .England, it is indeed way behind in the process,” he said.

“There would be new benefits in being able to localise a website to England specifically, as opposed to the UK, which for example, could be valuable for English tourism, farming, legal sectors and also personal websites.

“However, with about 10 million registrations to date, I do think that the existing .co.uk is doing a great job as a beacon for identifying UK based businesses, certainly for overseas audiences.”

“For many users, geographical identity is a powerful boon on the internet.”

The article then states that applicants in the last round of TLD allocations paid ICANN about £110,000 ($185,000), but estimates for total associated costs reach almost £300,000.

But that is not the problem. It is not like anyone can make apply for .england in the next round of new gTLDs and succeed. Geographical Names as gTLDs are clearly defined by the gTLD Applicant Guidebook, as gTLDs requiring government support. Geographical Name gTLDs have in common that the string is a meaningful representation or abbreviation of a geographical name that is protected by national laws.

So the .england New gTLD needs more of a local and national government support than it needs money.

Sold.Domains

About Konstantinos Zournas

Konstantinos studied Computer Engineering and Computer Science in London and lives in Athens, Greece. He loves domains and building websites. He is online since 1995, learned about html in 1996 and got into domains in 2002. He started the OnlineDomain.com blog in 2012.

7 comments

  1. Why not? For instance .uk is the whole of the UK, that’s England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. (Though most of Ireland is now independent.)
    .it .no .ru are the whole of their country. It’s not the same with .uk

    So in the new gTLD’s we have .scot for Scotland .crmyu for Wales and .irish for yep! Ireland.

    Now with much of the Scottish population wanting independence from England, I don’t see why England can’t have it’s own brand identity, albeit, .england is not as aesthetic as some extensions, it will be more localised.

    If England has to wait, so be it. I don’t see why there is an issue!

  2. LOL! Not much cash there at the moment! Anyway the’ve got immigration and terrorism issues on their hands.

  3. Of course, I knew that 😉

  4. Even if they release it, will have very little value, with .co.uk, and the release of the more desirable .uk, really no point, than a speculator gamble.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.