UDRP complaint for grief.net and grief-recovery.com was dismissed at the National Arbitration Forum. The decision of the panel was not to proceed with the UDRP because of a pending litigation. The three member Panel said …
Read More »Legal
UDRP complaint for Guarani.com denied – Yet another Brazilian Complainant
A three member Panel denied the UDRP complaint for the domain name Guarani.com that a Brazilian company filed at WIPO. The Panel denied the complaint because there was nothing indicating that the Respondent in the US …
Read More »UDRP complaint for MyCadillac.com denied – General Motors fails to win the geographic name
Panel denied the UDRP complaint for the domain name MyCadillac.com that General Motors made at WIPO. The Panel denied the complaint because the domain was used offering PPC links to the “Cadillac” geographic term only …
Read More »UDRP complaint denied for PetExpress.com – Complainant guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Marchex owned domain PetExpress.com gets a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking ruling as John Berryhill gets this complaint dismissed at NAF. This must be the longest decision I have ever seen for the simple reason that …
Read More »Target missed as UDRP complaint for the domain name TargetApplication.com was denied at NAF
Target had it’s UDRP complaint denied for the domain name TargetApplication.com. Panel said that a website with advertising links, can be a legitimate use, and that the presence of pay-per-click links on its site does …
Read More »Helion.com gets hit with a UDRP a month after it was sold at Snapnames for $9,445 – The complaint was denied at NAF
Helion.com got a UDRP complaint at the National Arbitration Forum a month after it was sold at Snapnames for $9,445. The domain was caught by Snapnames on the 7th of October 2012 and the auction …
Read More »UDRP complaint for EuroBaby.com denied at WIPO – John Berryhill doesn’t ask for RDNH
This could have been a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) case but it seems that John Berryhill didn’t ask for a RDNH finding. He might have thought that the two pending CTM applications that were …
Read More ».eu claims an 80% increase on ADR cases because of reduced fees
The Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) and .eu registry EURid have been running a special fee reduction to make the .eu Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process more affordable. The cost of a basic proceeding has been cut …
Read More »Facebook wins UDRP complaint for the domain FacebookEmail.com after 5+ months of waiting
The National Arbitration Forum decision to transfer the domain FacebookEmail.com to Complainant came after more than 5 months since the Complaint was submitted by Facebook. The Complaint was submitted by Facebook on June 28, 2012 …
Read More »Sedo’s legal liability – Sedo’s control panel parking optimization bug
Sedo has a bug at it’s control panel. Specifically the bug is at domain management and the parking optimization section. It is not possible to make bulk changes in the domain layouts and bulk changes in …
Read More »UDRP for gtms.com denied and RDNH found – Complaint used as the last resort to acquire the domain
Complainant filed for a UDRP for the domain gtms.com because Respondent didn’t reply to their interest of purchasing the domain name. The domain was registered 8 years before Complainant registered its “gtms” trademark. Complainant used …
Read More »What to do if you accidentally let your domain name expire. By 1&1…
I was browsing the 1&1 registrar website today (no I am not a customer) and found this useful advice to domain owners that did not intent to let their domains expire and their domains have …
Read More »xxx.info, jobs.info and 1174 others remain inactive – .info Sunrise Pending Reallocation domain names
I got a question a few days ago about why Domain Tools reports 1174 .info domain names with Registrant: “Afilias Ltd / Sunrise Pending Reallocation”. Actually there were 1228 domains in this state but a …
Read More »UDRP complaint for epitec.com denied at NAF – Respondent defaults but Complainant proves legitimate use on behalf of the Respondent!
Respondent chose not to waste his time and money and didn’t reply to these proceedings. Complainant managed to prove the 2nd element (legitimate use) of the UDRP in favor of the Respondent by submitting screenshots …
Read More »