If the Panelist had made a 5 minute research, she would have find that Respondent had “Rights or Legitimate Interests” and would have dismissed the Complaint. She didn’t do anything. A Complaint for the domain …
Read More »Legal
Are UDRP panelists paid for doing nothing?
UDRP complaint for adrianpeterson.com denied at NAF – legal counsel fails to file a proper complaint
The Complainant was Adrian Lewis Peterson, an American football running back for the Minnesota Vikings and the National Football League, was represented by D. George Brode of Gant & Hicks, PLLC, Texas, USA. Respondent was …
Read More »UDRP complaint for bilt.net denied at WIPO (Listing a domain for sale is not bad faith)
Panelist dismisses the UDRP complaint at WIPO for the domain bilt.net while finding that “Merely listing a domain name for sale, or for possible sale, on the Sedo platform usually is not, of itself, sufficient …
Read More »risingstar.com UDRP complaint denied at WIPO while Panel considers buying a domain as an investment
The UDRP Complaint for the domain name risingstar.com was denied at WIPO while the Panel recognized that buying a domain name can be considered an investment and that offering a domain for sale is not …
Read More »Complaint for cloudprovider.com denied at WIPO while Panelist acknowledges domaining
This was the first UDRP Complaint for a descriptive “cloud” related domain name and of course the Complaint was denied. I am sure a the cloud popularity increases many “cloud” UDRPs will follow. The Complaint …
Read More »Oakley loses dispute over myfakeoakleysunglasses.com at NAF
Oakley Inc. filed a complaint at the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) over myfakeoakleysunglasses.com and surprisingly the complaint was denied by a sole Panelist. The Complaint was submitted to the National Arbitration Forum electronically on July …
Read More »“Intent To Use” trademark application used to win a UDRP complaint at WIPO
Is an ITU (intent to use) trademark application enough to win a UDRP complaint? According to this freak decision, yes. Panelist Dr. Clive N.A. Trotman has a very good track record of fair decisions (with …
Read More »Dyson loses 2 UDRP complaints in a row at WIPO
Dyson lost 2 identical UDRP complaints within a month. Both complaints were for similar domain names, but with different Respondents, and both were decided by the same Panelist. The complaints were for bladelessfansmall.com and bladelessfanonline.com. …
Read More »KFC wins UDRP complaint for irankfc.com at WIPO but there is more to that…
KFC Corporation filed a UDRP complaint for the domain name irankfc.com at the World Intelectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center. The Respondent was Ruhollah Gheisarinia of Najafabad, Esfahan, Iran. KFC Corporation operates the KFC (Kentucky …
Read More »jenniferaniston.com Namejet auction cancelled
The domain jenniferaniston.com was registered with Network Solutions and it expired. So it was available for auction at Namejet. The domain entered an auction at Namejet on the 13th of August 2012 and it had …
Read More »Legal organization denied a UDRP complaint at NAF
Pro Bono Net, Inc., a national nonprofit organization based in New York City and San Francisco, filed a complaint at the National Arbitration Forum for the domain name lawhelpny.org on May 26, 2012. Pro Bono …
Read More »Complaint for domain newmd.com denied at NAF
The Complaint for the domain name newmd.com by Complainant Nuesoft Technologies, Inc. was denied at NAF in one of the shortest ever decisions in UDRP history. Respondent was Larry Smith / ProfessionalThinkers from Arizona, USA. The Complaint was …
Read More »Atlanta Better Business Bureau President Fred Elsberry Loses UDRP Complaint at WIPO
The Complaint for the domain name FredElsberry.com was filed by Fred Elsberry with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on June 25, 2012. Respondent was Mechanic’s Responds News Publication of Marietta, Georgia, United States. Fred …
Read More »Big Ass company is denied a UDRP complaint at NAF
Complainant with a Big Ass trademark failed to prove “Identical and/or Confusingly Similar” although Respondent defaulted. This seems to be a trend with clueless Complainants and their legal counsels. The domain name at issue was …
Read More »